Pages

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Steinbeck in Vietnam: Grim View Of "The Unforgiving"


'Steinbeck In Vietnam': A Great Writer's Last Reports

Author Thomas E. Barden is a professor at the University of Toledo.
Daniel Miller/Daniel Miller
Author Thomas E. Barden is a professor at the University of Toledo.
text size A A A
April 21, 2012
The last piece of published writing from one of America's greatest writers was a series of letters he sent back from the front lines of war at the age of 64.
John Steinbeck's reports shocked readers and family so much that they've never been reprinted — until now.
Steinbeck won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1962 for a life's work writing about those who had been roughed up by history — most notably his Depression-era novels, Of Mice And Men and The Grapes of Wrath. Four years later, Steinbeck left for Vietnam to cover the war firsthand.
His dispatches appeared in Newsday in 1966 and 1967 and are now collected in a volume called Steinbeck in Vietnam: Dispatches from the War.
University of Toledo professor Thomas E. Barden curated the collection. He tells Weekend Edition Saturday host Scott Simon that Steinbeck's public support for the Vietnam War was too much for fans to accept — a reaction so overwhelming that the letters were kept out of public view for years.
"People worried about his reputation, saying maybe we should just never speak of these again. A lot of people on the left felt that it was a deep betrayal," Barden says. "That attitude sort of went on for a long time — including within his family. I think his widow really didn't want them out."
At first, Steinbeck had been dubious about working forNewsday, which was owned by his friend Harry Guggenheim, Barden says.
"But then the war in Vietnam heated up, and one of Steinbeck's sons was in it, and his other son was going to it, and then suddenly he wanted to be there," Barden says. "So he made this arrangement with Guggenheim that he would go on behalf of Newsday."
Steinbeck had another high-profile friend — President Lyndon B. Johnson — who also wanted him to report on what was happening in Vietnam, but Steinbeck was adamant that he wasn't going there on Johnson's behalf; he was his own man and not involved with the government. His reports, however, did seem to support the war.
"If you read the dispatches, it's as if he truly believes it as much as Lyndon Johnson did — Domino Theory, the winnability," Barden says. Even Steinbeck's own son confronted him — in Vietnam — to argue that the war was wrong — "that all the troops were stoned, that the body count wasn't accurate, that it was a mess and we ought to get out. So they went at it right there from when they met in the hotel in Saigon."
But Steinbeck did have doubts about American involvement — he just didn't publicize them.
"In private letters, which he was writing at the same time, he was sort of indicating, this is kind of a mess," Barden says.
All these years later, Barden doesn't share worries of tarnishing Steinbeck's reputation by reprinting the Newsday letters.
"He's going to be around forever. High school students still love him. And I see a sense of completeness. I just want ... everything this man wrote should be on the shelf. And now it is."
comments

Tom Fiorill (tomf)
I could never bring myself to read the dispatches; Newsday was our local newspaper, though I love so much of Steinbeck's writing. I always figured it was his health that made him miss the problem of the Vietnam War. To this day I try not to think about his point of view on the war. Steinbeck had such humanity it most of his work. Vietnam was a tragic mistake for the US. A loss of lives and treasure that was unnecessary. And Vietnam today is so far from Communism.
Sat Apr 21 2012 15:51:14 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sanity Inspector (TheSanityInspector)
"But now, on the last night [aloft in an AC-47 on combat deployment in Vietnam], with the mission completed and only the winking ground fire and that receding behind us, I was afraid. More than that--I was scared. I could see the stray and accidental shot hit a flare and the whole ship go up in a huge Roman candle of incandescent searing light. I thought how silly it would be on my last night. I think it was the first time I had thought of myself, me, as being in danger. And then curious memories came back to me like movie shorts.[...]And only last week lying in the bunker with a boy who said, "Five more days--no, four days and thirteen hours, and I'll be going home. I thought the time would never come." And it didn't. He was killed on the next patrol.
"I was cold all over and trembling maybe somewhat from the grinding of the guns. And already we were landing and the mission was done and we were back early."
-- John Steinbeck, "Puff, the Magic Dragon", America and Americans and Selected Nonfiction, 2003
Sat Apr 21 2012 13:16:01 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sanity Inspector (TheSanityInspector)
" It was easy to report wars of movement, places taken and held or lost, lines established and clear, troops confronting each other in force and fighting until one side or the other lost. Big battles are conceivable, can be reported like a bullfight. You could see if only on a map all previous wars--on one side of a line our friends, on the other our enemies. Vietnam is not like that at all and I wonder whether it can be described. Maybe the inability to communicate its quality is the reason for the discontent and frustration of the press corps here. Many of the fine reporters here understand this war, but their readers don't and often their editors demand the kind of war they are used to and comfortable with."
-- John Steinbeck, _America and Americans and Selected Nonfiction_, 2003
Sat Apr 21 2012 13:11:25 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sanity Inspector (TheSanityInspector)
Er, Steinbeck's dispatches from Vietnam, at least some of them, have been available for some time, most recently in America And Americans And Selected Nonfiction, from 2003. He was in fact a sharp observer--he just didn't share the Sixties Left's self-congratulating faith in the unique evil of the United States, and that's a good thing.
Sat Apr 21 2012 13:10:39 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Michael Daly (mickeymouseclicker)
He should have listened to his own son.
Sat Apr 21 2012 12:34:38 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Michael Daly (mickeymouseclicker)
Just about as disappointing as I felt in the early 70's when I was carrying one of those placards that read "Support the Seven Point Peace Plan of the PRG(Provisional Revolutionary Gov't). Steinbeck talks about VC like they were a disease. Did he decide to quit writing when Johnson decided not to run for re-election? Did he think he would never hunker in a foxhole in his own land of milk and honey to defend it? Brings to mind a Bob Dylan line "Propaganda all is phoney" ...even when someone who we think is great is spreading it.
Sat Apr 21 2012 12:27:02 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Steven Kite (stormkite)
Perhaps this is a difference between war seen as part of politics and war seen as human interaction.
Sat Apr 21 2012 11:34:51 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Pedro Troche (Pedrin)
Great writer but he was wrong about Nam. That's okay, we all make mistakes.
Sat Apr 21 2012 10:59:26 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Rick Johnson (rickvj03)
@Wolfgang Liederhosen:
Very good insight.
Sat Apr 21 2012 10:32:39 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Wolfgang Liederhosen (ZXKVB)
Thinking back to those days, Steinbeck believed he was part of a great crusade for democracy. The nationalist driver of the war was concealed behind a smokescreen- Communisim. We created that smokescreen out of our own fears and missed what the war was really about. If Steinbeck lived to see how Viet Nam fared after the war up to today he might have felt differently about the 1960s. That is the benefit of the long historical view.
Sat Apr 21 2012 09:04:53 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)

No comments:

Post a Comment